Archive for June, 2007
Local Search Loopholes ~ How to show up for Google Local without having a local business
So I’ve been asked recently, “Hey Jeff, when I search for something chicago, it comes up with a map of Chicago with local businesses pinpointed on there. How do I get on there?”
Well, if you have a business, you can easily add yourself to Google’s local business center. It only takes a few minutes and they will mail you a postcard to verify your address or give you a call. I’ve set up a number of business in Google local, and never had the opportunity for verification via a phone call. This is the legitimate way of setting yourself up.
The “other” version of setting this up is via a PO box. So say, you have “Tony’s IT Consulting” and the nature of your business is distributed. You probably only have one office in one city, but technically you can work in any city since you either do everything over the web or you will fly to that location if business requires. For example: Tony has an office in Cleveland, but the clients he wants to obtain are in El Paso. Just follow these easy steps to show up in Google local results, sans local office:
- Decide what markets you want to be in. (i.e. El Paso)
- Search Google maps for the city center of El Paso.
- Then search for the closest UPS, FedEx, or other business which offers PO Box service.
- This is the hard part: Fly, drive, or train to that city, since the only way to set up a PO box at these offices is to get one in person, usually with two forms of ID.
- Have your mail forwarded to your Cleveland office.
- Set up a Google local business in El Paso, the mail is forwarded to your Cleveland office, and Voila!
- You now have a Google local business listing in El Paso, when your office is in Cleveland.
This is right on the razor’s edge of Google’s terms of service, so proceed at your own discretion.
No commentsGoogle gets into Electric Cars ~ Who needs a hundred year head start?
10 year old Silicon Valley Startup: 1
110 year old Detroit Auto Industry: 0
Well at least somebody is concerned with getting the electric vehicle off the ground. In a recent post on Google’s blog, they have been partnering with a few other silicon valley startups to get electric vehicles into the mainstream faster than the US auto industry seems to want to do:
We’ve been working with Google engineers and Hymotion/A123Systems to build a small fleet of plug-in hybrids, adding an external plug and additional batteries to a regular hybrid car so that it runs on electricity with gasoline (or even better, biofuels) to extend the driving range for longer trips.
Be still my nerdy heart. And with Congress finally getting into high gear, we may actually be making some progress towards oil independence, maybe, sort of, kind of.
Well, you have to start somewhere, and as my Digg traffic told me, consumers are definitely excited for a car that can deliver both fuel economy, practicality, and eco-friendliness.
1 commentWhy doesn’t Pandora have audio ads?
Does anyone know the answer to this? I’ve been an avid Pandora listener since day 1 and wondered when they would either go to:
- A subscription model
- Have audio ads between songs similar to regular commercial radio.
Thankfully, Pandora is the best thing since the last best thing and hasn’t done either of those. I have to wonder though, are those ad placements around the audio player turning the kind of profits they would hope? I mean, my typical user experience is to launch the player, go to a new tab or window, and forget about the Pandora interface all together. The only time I return is usually to vote a song up or down and then move back to what I was doing. I guess the advertisers can hope that my brief interaction is enough to hook me.
Where I think they are definitely making their money is via referral fees from iTunes or Amazon where people buy music. I know that I often hear a great song, hop over to Pandora, and ad it to my Amazon wish list for a later date. So it’s not an immediate revenue stream for either Pandora or Amazon, but a postponed one.
Any others with similar experiences and/or interactions?
1 commentI’m a Guest Speaker at Chicago Arts and Business Council on July 10th
WARNING: SHAMELESS SELF PROMOTION AHEAD!
Well, I was approached the other day by the Arts and Business Council of Chicago to speak at their July 10th conference on Blogs and Online Communities:
Blogs and Online Communities
Tuesday, July 10th at 10:00 AM
The launch of ChicagoClassicalMusic.org through A&BC’s E-Commerce Incubator marked the beginning of a continuing effort to explore and develop online communities. Learn from experts how online communities and blogs are developed and executed. Hear how they integrate and track with your marketing and communication efforts, and how they can be used to engage arts enthusiasts of all ages and interests.
Asked what I would like to present, I said “Let’s set up a blog in five minutes. Live!” So that’s what I’ll be doing. Setting up a blog at a property I registered just for this event: NorthsideArtist.com. I’m going to set up a shell of a website with a placeholder for “blog” and then install Wordpress, set up an administrator, apply a theme to the site, and make a post in around 5 minutes. This can only truly be done with the ease of installation of Wordpress and the readily available themes due to its fanatical open source development community.
The audience is primarily artists and non-profits in the Chicago area who are interested in getting involved in online communities, blogging, and all things Web 2.0, but anyone who is interested is welcome in attending.
Here’s another post about it:
Blogs and Online Communities Announced
Registration Form
Wish me luck! I’ll post any interesting happenings afterward here.
3 commentsSemel steps down ~ Google should buy Yahoo Now!
Yahoo announced today that Terry Semel will be stepping down as CEO:
Yahoo Inc. Chairman Terry Semel stepped down as chief executive in a surprise move Monday, ending his increasingly ineffectual pursuit of online search leader Google Inc. — a losing battle that had demoralized Yahoo’s shareholders and employees.
I couldn’t say it better myself. Semel has had one failure after another, believing that content will save Yahoo with their newly revamped mission statement earlier this year and the Panama engine redesign. I don’t mean to be harsh on the guy, as I’m sure he did many things to try and turn Yahoo around, but when you consistently lose money quarter after quarter why is he the highest compensated CEO in the country? This is another Enron in the waiting.
If Google is paying attention, now is the time to pounce on Yahoo and buy them out. I’m sure Microsoft is counting the pennies right now. If Google could purchase the content and application network that is Yahoo, which actually has a lot of great web properties (Flickr, Upcoming.org, Yahoo Answers, etc.) and the ad network, they could pretty much write Microsoft’s obituary in terms of online presence. It would definitely save Google from trying to build everything from the ground up, which I believe they are inclined to do anyway, but why make it any harder? Of course, there’s the pesky SEC that could block such a merger, but they seem to be all about huge mergers lately and I don’t think they would even bat an eye.
I guess we’ll see who the potential suitors turn out to be after Semel steps down and Yang steps up.
1 commentGood brand names don’t need SEO or SEM ~ Why are you bidding against yourself?
During several recent SEO and SEM campaigns, I’ve seen a few clients trying to bid or pursue organically their own brand or company names. This is a good strategy if you have obscure brand names or company names: Cleaning Product 5, Chicago Consulting, or Joe’s Diner. But if you are a major brand and your customers are smart enough to go after that specific brand name, product name, or company name which you have trademarked and patented then let them. Don’t spend your ad dollars going after something like that. It would be better served putting it to use in other more competitive segments where you cannot make headway either organically or with PPC.
Also, I’ve noticed a practice recently by some unsavory marketing firms, who shall rename nameless, who bid against other marketing firms’ names to compete against them. Seriously? Do you think it’s worth your ad dollars to bid for a user who was obviously looking for “Company X” and instead saw your ad for “Company Y”? Do you think that is an effective strategy beyond making yourself look unprofessional in the ad landscape or that the person will have a last minute change of heart and instead say “Well, I was going to spend several hundreds of thousands of dollars with Company X, but I saw your ad and I guess I’ll flop over to you instead.” Somehow I don’t think that is the case.
Bottom line: I think bidding against your competitors is only an effective strategy very early in the buy cycle of a purchase where the user is still defining their search criteria and trying to put competing companies next to each other. If I am searching for “cherry cola” and I see an ad for Cherry Pepsi and Cherry Coke, I may go either way, but if I search for Cherry Coke, I’m not likely to be dissuaded by an ad for Cherry Pepsi.
1 commentThe Summer of Search ~ It’s Getting Hot in Here!
Well the search landscape is getting awfully hot these days my friends. Apparently, Microsoft has been getting back some of their lost market share with the advent of Vista and mandatory installs of IE7. Not content with that though, they have spun off their own A-Team of search developers in Silicon Valley to compete with the “Big G“.
Yahoo has also been busy bees with Panama and their new API functionality to let people tap into their search data. My biggest hope, from an SEO standpoint, is that they allow people to start accessing and writing more robust queries of Overture keyword data.
Ask.com just released a newly designed site. I like the theme stuff, but am I really going to spend that much time on the homepage to enjoy a “theme”? I guess it’s a fun little feature of differentiation. They have a new 3 column layout called Ask 3D, which I kind of like as opposed to Google’s universal search in which everything is tossed in together.
And finally, we have Mahalo, which bills itself as the human powered search engine. Isn’t that technically every search engine though, as somebody has to build the infrastructure? I like this website, mostly for the nostalgic value of working at BeautifulIsland.com back in the day. Very islandy and tropical color scheme and layout. We’ll see how this goes. We’ve seen other examples of what human powered can do: Jyve and ChaCha.com, which are not that impressive. I just don’t think the “human powered search” platform is robust enough to keep up with the ever changing internet data landscape, except for the rare niche of “I’m too damn lazy to search for myself”, which I don’t think is that substantial.
What do you think is going to be the next hot thing in search?
1 comment
Blogs and Online Communities